Friday, September 17, 2010

Stanley's Noir Farce: "Little Lulu Is Taken For A Ride," from Four Color 131, 1947

I'm always happy to present stories that John Stanley both wrote and drew. (To be accurate, this is an art collaboration of Stanley and Charles Hedinger.) He seems to have really given cartooning a concerted effort in the late 1940s. He drew "Woody Woodpecker," "Tom and Jerry," "Little Lulu," "Raggedy Ann and Andy" and his own creations, "Jigger and Mooch" and "Peterkin Pottle."

Dark themes are a constant of these stories. "Little Lulu," the most heavily protected of the various licensed entities John Stanley brought to the comic book page, tended to be less grim and downcast in its early years. Once Marge Buell seemed confident in Team Stanley to deliver the goods for her gag-panel creations, Little Lulu began to get more of a taste of the real John Stanley.

Themes of despair, abandonment, physical threats, homelessness, hunger and poverty pepper his 1940s stories, starting with his first masterwork, "The Secret Six," in 1945.

Most of these themes are, indeed, staples of comedy. To be fair, Stanley plays them for comedy, with exceptions in his longer one-shot adventure stories. Here is a deadly-serious excerpt from "The Mad Dog Mystery," an Andy Panda story from 1945:


Stanley and Carl Barks worked in similar manner on their early adventure stories. As with Barks' "Terror of the River," "Ghost of the Grotto" and "Mystery of the Swamp," Stanley's efforts in this vein have a light dusting of comedy, but are serious pieces overall.

The Little Lulu one-shots, which appeared alongside these usually book-length serious pieces, are suites of shorter stories, including a liberal amount of single-page pantomime gags.

Perhaps Stanley felt inspired by the longer pieces he had written. In 1947, he tried two unusually long Lulu stories. "Little Lulu is Taken For a Ride" is the second-longest such piece, after "Alvin's Solo Flight" (also published that year). Unlike Stanley's earlier long stories, "Ride" plays its dark elements for broad, bright comedy, and focuses centrally on character quirks, rather than narrative stakes.

There's nothing funny about kidnapping, natch, but it was a frequent plot device in 1940s  and '50s mass media. Stanley had an affinity for pop-culture cliches--more precisely, for how he could skewer reader expectations of these stock situations.

In this 21-page story, Stanley takes time to set up a seemingly high-stakes, no-fun-intended world of crime and kidnapping. The first page is given over to a discussion between two thugs. Lulu enters on the second page, via omniscient narration. Stanley seldom uses a narrator in Little Lulu--unless it is Lulu herself, telling one of her on-the-fly fairy-tales.

Stanley could not have written this story for the 1950s "Lulu." Here, she is still in Marge mode--she's the apparently innocent hellion who wreaks havoc with a poker face. Just by being in the same room with the kidnappers, and staying with them, she causes their plans--and lives--to unravel.

This story, along with "Alvin's Solo Flight," was reprinted in the first 100-page "Lulu" comic book, the gruffly titled Little Lulu Tubby Annual 1953. More recent reprints, brutally traced in stark black-and-white, have appeared from Another Rainbow and Dark Horse. Here it is, as originally published, in off-center, blotchy living color... (and with a missing page finally added on 12/10/10!)



Lulu is never in serious danger for a single moment in this story. She may flirt with tooth decay on p. 2, get snatched on p. 5, suffer mild internal jostling on p. 9 and almost get throttled on p. 19. Other than that, she emerges from this potentially harrowing episode unscathed--while Al and "Boss" are so ravaged by their time with her that they abandon crime as a career option.

Because this story is so upfront about its dark themes, it achieves moments of sublime comedy. Stanley's dry tone assures that these comedic uprisings delight and disarm the reader.

Al and "Boss" are members of the Wile E. Coyote Club. They get abused, then step back in line for more of same. In the wake of the kidnapping (a sequence with Hitchcockian overtones), "Boss" is pummeled by the struggling tot and given a black eye. Lulu's subsequent episode with the machine gun leaves "Boss" dazed and apparently dead.

Al soberly digs a grave for "Boss," with Lulu's cheerful assistance: "This is fun!" she says. Samuel Beckett couldn't have written this profoundly absurd scene any better. Ditto for the earlier bit in which "Boss" and Lulu struggle over the spelling of the word "daughter."

"Boss" is an ineffective leader. Stanley's interest is in Al--a stock figure invested with unexpected character. The story's length allows Stanley to indulge in some fine quirk-driven comedy. Man-child Al and child-woman Lulu constantly spin the status wheel. Their dance of control is a thing of beauty.

The story's climax, on p. 21, offers its only scene of real physical violence. As my colleague Thad K. has noted, Stanley had trouble drawing scenes of violence. His line of action in panel 5 is wooden and awkward. Saddled with the demand to emulate the amateurish cartoon style of Marge Buell, Stanley did not do his finest cartooning on these early Little Lulu stories. The lifeless pen line, a la Marge, gives his work here a leaden quality.

Sparks of life break through the stylistic curtain, but the ungainly Marge look and feel takes its toll on his cartooning. "Lulu" didn't really look good until the end of the 1940s.

As a great admirer of John Stanley's cartooning, I find his work on the early Lulu a misfire. He put a great deal of effort into these stories. Here, we see TLC paid to the "camera angles," the compositions of panels, and in the body language of the characters. P. 17 impresses with its multiple angle drawings of a 1940s automobile. Though some of the drawings are ungainly, the ambition and energy of this sequence is impressive.

It's not Stanley's fault that he had to draw the figures in the ugly Marge style. His writing is the real star of the series, and he achieved some great cartooning in other 1940s features. (For a stunning example of his 1940s cartooning, check out his New Yorker cartoon.)

For dessert, here are four pantomime gag pages from this Lulu one-shot, carefully chosen for their taboo themes of spanking, smoking, make-up abuse, and physical violence. Early Lulu, still in Marge-mode, is quite the hellion!

Friday, September 10, 2010

Killer, Not Filler Pt. II--Two Newly Discovered John Stanley WOODY WOODPECKER One-Pagers!

These just in: I finally found a copy of NEW FUNNIES #130. It's been on my imaginary want-list for a few years. (No, I don't carry one of those smudged ring binders riddled with serial-killer scrawls, as pertains to my comic book holdings and desired items... sorry to disappoint!)

I wasn't holding my breath for Stanley material here. I'm also missing issue 131, which is unaccountably hard to find. I have determined that issue 132 (which is commonplace) has no Stanley content, and that all issues, from 132 on, are by other hands, including Frank Thomas and Charles Hedinger.

Jury's still out on NF 131. To my delight, issue 130 contained two more John Stanley-drawn (and written) "Woody Woodpecker" gag pages. One of them is a three-quarter page, due to a Dell subscription coupon.

Click HERE to visit the newly-updated post that contains several other John Stanley-penned 'pecker pages. I've substantially reworked the existing text, so it merits another go-round, reading-wise... enjoy!

Sunday, September 5, 2010

Panda-monium Out West: John Stanley's First Long Narrative (Andy Panda Four-Color 54, 1944)


John Stanley claimed two Bugs Bunny comic books as his first work for Western Publications. This baffles me, as the two comics in question (Four Colors 33 and 51) are clearly the work of the West Coast division, with Californian artists such as Tom McKimson having done the final artwork. Plus, they're distinctly inferior to even the earliest work of John Stanley--a general trend of the West Coast material of this era, Carl Barks aside.
Why Stanley included these false credits in his q.v. beats me. Thus, his first long comics narrative is the Western burlesque "The Ghostrider--" subject of today's post. First, here's the bondage-is-fun cover:


In the spirit of Carl Barks' first few long narratives ("The Mummy's Ring" and "Porky of the Mounties" in particular), this is less of a bona-fide adventure and more of a broad genre take-off. Barks' stories, even at their most burlesque, still come off as more grave than Stanley's--at least, until Stanley's early dark masterwork "The Secret Six," which can be read HERE.

As first efforts go, "The Ghostrider" is not bad. It flails about harmlessly, with the occasional investiture of wit and narrative skill. (The more playful second story in this issue, "The Magic Hat," can be found HERE.)




"The Ghostrider" lacks the narrative polish and stakes-building that would typify John Stanley's work by the late 1940s. Top-heavy with licensed supporting characters (Andy's goil Miranda, and Woody Woodpecker's nemesis Wally Walrus), the story burns through many pages without achieving much.
When the stakes-raising, more straight adventure material kicks in, later in the story, Stanley's telling becomes more efficient. Action sequences peppered with strong gags manage to hold the reader's interest.
Most compelling are the group of hotel "porch loafers" who decide to give chicken and panda an old-school Western shoot-em-up, more out of general boredom than of score-settling. This meta-story (within a story) seems to dismiss the Western adventure genre as a quaint thing, at best. While this is a stand-out sequence in a fair-to-middlin' story, it serves to make the actual no-kidding action sequences rather perfunctory.
Said sequence is punctuated with welcome humor, and includes one of Stanley's earliest double-whammies of "CHOFF" and "CHOMPF." Other early Stanleyisms such as un-punctuated speech balloons, sound effects in speech balloons, and the ever-present YOW align this first long narrative to Stanley's contemporary New Funnies and Our Gang Comics work.
Note the name "GROGAN" on page six. "Grogan" pops up in Stanley's and Walt Kelly's Western material of the mid-1940s. Was there a Grogan on the Western art staff? Or was this the name of their favorite bartender? I dunno...
John Stanley was on a road of rapid growth as a cartoonist and story-teller in 1944 and '45. Compare this story with "The Secret Six" as a measurement of his progress in the comics medium.

For a comedic chaser, here's the filler one-page gag that occupied the inner front cover. This is more immediately familiar Stanley territory...

Thursday, September 2, 2010

Cover Story: John Stanley's Cover for New Funnies 92, 1944

Heritage Auction Galleries' auctions are a wealth of giant-sized images of old pop-culture detritus, including 1940s comic book covers.
I spotted this today and was struck by the obvious drawing of John Stanley.
This is certainly one of his earliest covers. The backgrounds are redolent of Stanley's spiky pen and ink style--as are the reluctant figure of Charlie Chicken, the schoolhouse, and the books and grass in the image's foreground.
The focus figure of Andy Panda seems to be more carefully rendered than the rest of the cover's elements.
I much more prefer the energetic, vivid lines of everything else (even Andy's body), but it's a super piece of cartooning by anyone's standards. Compare this 1944 piece to Stanley's Woody Woodpecker one-pagers for some obvious visual tells.
If/when I find other early Stanley-drawn covers, I'll post them here. And that's all for this ultra-short posting!